Radius Industrial Case Studies


  • Section 18 for Tenant
  • Landlord’s Claim - £63,788.90
  • Section 18 valuation - £10,000
  • Settlement - £32,000
  • Prudential Assurance - v - James Grant - found that it is not necessary for the Landlord to provide DV to substantiate their claim in Scotland
  • However, Court may be persuaded by a Tenant’s DV that the Landlord’s loss can be ‘capped’ at a lower level than the ‘costs of works’
  • Older industrial unit with limited marketability - therefore dealing with certain works (including ‘dirty’ rooflights, ‘soiled’ cladding) will have no positive impact on value
  • Landlord accepted Diminution argument in agreeing a lower settlement than their Claim


  • Section 18 for Tenant
  • Landlord’s Claim £1 Million
  • Section 18 £160,000
  • Former Distribution Centre totalling 500,000 sq ft
  • Various Reinstatement works would not be ‘value affective’ including removal of office partitions, high spec racking system and tenant installed toilet block
  • Local industrial market illustrated this
  • Section 18 assisted in settlement of £400,000


  • Section 18 for Tenant
  • Landlord’s Claim c£75,000.
  • Tenant’s S.18 - £nil
  • Tenant spent c£120,000 at lease expiry on various items of disrepair
  • Landlord’s Claim referred to internal decorations to warehouse (repainting floor and steelwork), external decorations and full replacement of cracked (although accepted as still being wind and watertight) Georgian glazing
  • Considering the size, use and market, none of these items were likely to have a positive impact upon value
  • Settlement - £15,000


  • Section 18 for Tenant
  • Landlord’s Claim - £161,000 plus costs
  • Tenant’s B.S Response - £46,000 plus costs
  • Section 18 valuation - £30,000 (plus contractually obligated costs)
  • Result - £35,000 (inclusive of costs)
  • Principal factors advanced for Tenant:
    • Corrugated asbestos roof - Property therefore at or about the end of its useful economic life in any event
    • Several voids on the Estate - supply exceeding demand
  • Tenant advised on Valuation by Radius Consulting


  • Section 18 for Tenant
  • Landlord’s Claim £427,000 plus costs and loss of rent
  • Claim of £427,000 agreed by Tenant’s Building Surveyor
  • Landlord’s Section 18 - £620,000.
  • Tenant’s S.18 £300,000
  • Settlement at Mediation - £385,000 inclusive of costs
  • Landlord spent £427,000 on putting the property back into ‘repair’
  • However, Section 18 advice provided evidence to justify limited industrial demand for unit of this size in this location
  • As a result not all of the works would be required in order to re-let
  • S.18 advice helped to remove non value affective works and loss of rent from the Claim

Paul J Raeburn BSc (Hons) MRICS DipArb FCIArb 
RICS Accredited Mediator
Neil Burridge BSc (Hons) MRICS ACIArb
RICS Registered Valuer

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

CIArb exists for the global promotion, facilitation and development of all forms of private dispute resolution around the world to maximise the contribution that dispute resolution practitioners make.

Regulated by RICS

"Regulated by RICS" confirms to potential clients that we can be trusted to deliver high standards of service. "Regulated by RICS" conveys a consistent message of confidence and quality to our clients.